the library practicum
Page’s Purpose:
The information found herein is in partial fulfillment of the LIS courses I’m currently taking as part of MIS degree at Southern Utah University. The evidence presented is in support of my knowledge of the the ALA/AASL/CAEP Librarian Preparation Standards as listed in the ALA/AASL/CAEP Librarian Preparation Standards as well as in the Southern Utah University K-12 Library Media Endorsement Competencies.
In addition to the artifacts included on this page, a curriculum vitae and statement of my educational philosophy can be found here. If you are a professor from SUU, you can find my practicum hours here (unless you’re my current professor in which case my hours have been logged on the form you supplied in Canvas).
Please note that this page will be updated at least bi-annually.
Stock Image by Rankin
Who wouldn’t want to learn in a space like this? What if our public school libraries were designed with an eye to learning in beauty — what then would our students create? who then would they choose to become?
Cubicle illustrating understanding of physical variabilities of patrons. photo by a. gardner.
preview of learning commons. video by a. gardner
Standard 1: The Learner and Learning
Candidates in school librarian preparation programs are effective educators who demonstrate an awareness of learners’ development. Candidates promote cultural competence and respect for inclusiveness. Candidates integrate the National School Library Standards considering learner development, diversity, and differences while fostering a positive learning environment. Candidates impact student learning so that all learners are prepared for college, career, and life.
Standard 1.1 Learner Development. Candidates demonstrate the ways learners grow within and across cognitive, psychomotor, affective, and developmental domains. Candidates engage learners’ interests to think, create, share and grow as they design and implement instruction that integrates the National School Library Standards.
Being able to engage all students in one lesson is a falsehood that is, in modern pedagogical study, upheld as truth more often than not, especially in light of the deification of standardized exams and prescribed curriculum offered up in compensation for teacher intensification. However, what is true, is that each of our students are at unique developmental stages and that our role as librarians is to attempt to meet every student where she is and guide her, via our resources, toward an individual who has the ability to successfully contribute to her life, her community, and her nation. To illustrate my understanding of this librarian duty, I offer my lesson plan on media literacy created for my LIS 6100 course.
The lesson engages students by tapping into their video laden world, providing them with the language and knowledge they need to decode that world, and assists them in practicing their analytical and presentation skills. Find the lesson attached here: Library Inquiry Lesson: Medium & Message.
Standard 1.2. Learner Diversity. Candidates articulate and model cultural competence and respect for inclusiveness, supporting individual and group perspectives.
This standard’s ambiguity regarding “cultural competence” makes it difficult for me concur with the standard as presented. If cultural competence means an adherence to erecting displays that match the celebratory months in order to show support for group perspectives, then I cannot demonstrate competence.
However, if cultural competence means that I greet each patron as a member of my campus community, impress upon them the expectations of the library, and invite them to explore the wonders contained therein without alteration, then I will point to my interactions with students. A few opt to come in and assist me during their lunches; one comes in when there is a substitute (I’ve checked that his teachers are okay with this) as well as during lunch, and he moves things about and I listen to his digressions and observations and ask questions when I can to pivot his thoughts to differing perspectives. Today he stayed after his last final and moved a great many heavy art books that need adding to the collection from the wall that needs to be painted to the back room where they can wait. He commented, almost surprised, that he is “more helpful here [in the library] than [he] is at home.” When asked why, he said that it’s because I treat him with respect. I responded that that’s what I’m supposed to do. I also shush him when he gets too loud, remind him to put things back, and ask him to move heavy things — in other words, I expect him to act like a polite young man and correct him towards that behavior. It is what I do with each student that enters our learning commons - the expectations are the same: respect self - respect place - respect others — and when those expectations are not met, correction is given and, if it’s still not met, consequences meted and second chances earned.
Still, I’ve no displays celebrating one gender over the other, nor any photos illustrating how one pigmented group is spotlighted over another, nor any other item that may satisfy this requirement. The only thing I do have is my certainty that every individual who enters will be greeted, assisted, and welcomed into the space I designed to help them believe in themselves.
Standard 1.3 Learning Differences. Candidates cultivate the educational and personal development of all members of a learning community, including those with diverse intellectual abilities, learning modalities, and physical variabilities.
The photo to the left demonstrates my understanding of a cultivation of patrons’ educational and personal levels despite their mental and physical abilities and aptitudes. Most specifically, the photo illustrates recognition of possible physical limitations of patrons as the width of the area, which will ultimately house a table and four chairs, allows for those in wheel chairs or on crutches or unbalanced to have enough room to move around the shelves without bumping into the bookcases or other patrons. Additionally, the bottom row of novels is pushed to the edge of the shelf to allow for easier access to patrons with limited mobility.
What the image does not illustrate is the varying reading levels held in the works remaining in the collection. While the volumes average 20 years old and will need replacing, I’ve attempted to retain both higher and lower reading levels in every area so that patrons interested in a subject will be more likely to find a volume they can read.
Standard 1.4 Learning Environments. Candidates create both physical and virtual learner-centered environments that are engaging and equitable. The learning environments encourage positive social interaction and curation and creation of knowledge.
A neon outline of the Las Vegas Strip from the east side and of the mountains that loom over the campus; an Abraham Lincoln portrait as Batman; a metal image of chocolate crystals that look like sunrise over a calm ocean. Butcher block tables and bench seating, artistic coaster for water bottles (no food here), and gathering areas for small conversations or quiet study. An 18 foot high top table with green seats (my one nod to different colors) tucked in the alcove that will one day become two study rooms but for now suffices as a gathering space for gamers and groups. A showroom zSpace lab with 40 stations and its own accent color. This is what is to come. It is my design and, as such, indicates my understanding and implementation of this particular standard. (See video at left.)
Standard 2: Planning for Instruction
Candidates in school librarian preparation programs collaborate with the learning community to strategically plan, deliver, and assess instruction. Candidates design culturally responsive learning experiences using a variety of instructional strategies and assessments that measure the impact on student learning. Candidates guide learners to reflect on their learning growth and their ethical use of information. Candidates use data and information to reflect on and revise the effectiveness of their instruction. ALA Librarian Preparation Standards 2.
(Hello, Ms. Frost’s class. Please click THIS LINK to find today’s lesson.)
Standard 2.1 Planning for Instruction. Candidates collaborate with members of the learning community to design developmentally and culturally responsive resource-based learning experiences that integrate inquiry, innovation, and exploration and provide equitable, efficient, and ethical information access.
I believe that my role as a librarian is to support my faculty and their students in their exploration of education. This is evidenced by the ease with which my colleagues and I collaborate, their enthusiasm for the re-imagining of the library, and their desire to work in media literacy and library lessons despite the curricular micromanaging of the district. That I exhibit this standard is evident in the following assignment completed for LIS 6200 in the fall of 2023.
Standard 2.2 Instructional Strategies. Candidates use a variety of instructional strategies and technologies to ensure that learners have multiple opportunities to inquire, include, collaborate, curate, explore, and engage in their learning.
This can be seen in the design of the webpage for the biology and media literacy lesson piloted on 13 October 2023 with middling success. The webpage can be found at this link.
Standard 2.3 Integrating Ethical Use of Information into Instructional Practice. Candidates teach learners to evaluate information for accuracy, bias, validity, relevance, and cultural context. Learners demonstrate ethical use of information and technology in the creation of new knowledge.
This standard is the essence of media analysis. While there is not a solid lesson on it, there is the following created teaching script and lesson that indicates I understand this standard. There are also my credentials as a teacher and teacher-educator that would, hopefully, satisfy this library science standard.
Standard 2.4 Assessment. Candidates use multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth. Candidates, in collaboration with instructional partners, revise their instruction to address areas in which learners need to develop understanding.
The assessment most utilized by me is observation and experience. This formative assessment is cumulative, not formalized. However, the following forms
as well as the informal Ticket-Out-of-the-Door and sundry other preparations are indicators of successful completion of this assessment.
Stock Image by Angelina Yan
Honors Chem Reading Circle - a. gardner. | Posted with permission, a spontaneous reading of The Cat in the Hat during a soft lockdown. The first use of the ELC as it was intended, for engagement with books, with ideas, and with each other through reading. Spring 2024.
Standard 3: Knowledge and Application of Content
Candidates in school librarian preparation programs are knowledgeable in literature, digital and information literacies, and current instructional technologies. Candidates use their pedagogical skills to actively engage learners in the critical-thinking and inquiry process. Candidates use a variety of strategies to foster the development of ethical digital citizens and motivated readers.
Standard 3.1 Reading Engagement. Candidates demonstrate a knowledge of children’s and young adult literature that addresses the diverse developmental, cultural, social, and linguistic needs of all learners. Candidates use strategies to foster learner motivation to read for learning, personal growth, and enjoyment.
Evidence that I have met this standard is most directly found in the annotated bibliography created for Dr. Jesseman’s LIS 6300 course. While only 20 entries, it includes genres of multiple levels and interests with even the children’s books potential teaching tools at the high school level.
I have employed several strategies for motivating students to read and to engage with their readings. The primary technique for engaging students, after a semester of research, was rebranding the library as the Eldorado Learning Center (the ELC). This rebrand included a complete redesign of the space - an inclusion of a zSpace laboratory, new furnishing and live plants, rearrangement of shelving into alcoves of learning, inclusion of computers with software otherwise only available to the Magnet students, the purchase of art specific to the ELC, and the creation of two art galleries for student work and one for a local guest artist. Additionally, during reconstruction, collection purchases have been prompted by student and faculty request; the most recent interaction was the fulfillment of a freshman’s request for chess books and his returning as a sophomore to find that his requests had been completed and he happily went home with the book.
Standard 3.2 Information Literacy. Candidates know when and why information is needed, where to find it, and how to evaluate, use[,] and communicate it in an ethical manner. Candidates model, promote, and teach critical-thinking and the inquiry process by using multiple literacies.
This standard is in the process of being met though my collaboration with faculty this term to design lessons and ELC pages specific to their curricular needs. [Note: I arrived in November 2022 with the task of upgrading the library space to the 21st century [see original space & new space ] and broke the task into 3 phases: observe and assess needs; physical space alteration to meet those needs; and patron engagement & collection updating. I have just started Phase 3.]
To teach critical thinking skills and information research strategy, I created, again for Professor Jessseman’s class, The Eight Steps of Information Literacy shown below:
The Eight Steps of Information Literacy (TESOIL)
Step 1. Do What?
Understand the research required.
put it in your own words
check for understanding with your teacher and/or colleagues
Step 2. So What?
Determine the So What? of the research. In other words, why do it?
find what aspect of this assignment is important to you
make certain this aspect connects to the original assignment
Step 3. Know What?
Write what you already know and determine what you need to know
brainstorm, list, cloud cluster, use whatever method works for you
Step 4. Where What?
Where can you get the information you need to know?
check libraries — school, public, electronic
check alternative sources — personal observation, experts in the field, emerging technology sources (VR/CVR)
Step 5. How What?
Consider how findings in Step 4 is presented — book, video, immersive — and how the presentation/modality impacts the information.
books — consider diction, organization, images, author, publisher
video — angles, shots, sound, colors, mis-en-scene
websites — fonts, colors, images, sources, references
immersive — how viewed (screen or HMD), creator, content focal point, audio, edits (if any), voiceover (if any), point-of-view manipulation (if any), user content interaction (if any)
Step 6. Just What?
Familiarize yourself with your research findings so that you become the expert in your material.
group similar information from varied sources together
consider strength of each piece of information (determined by quality of source and validity of data)
determine the overall “so what?” of the information you gathered
winnow what is superfluous or erroneous (depending on task, this may be presented in separate section)
Step 7. Now What?
Prepare your findings for distribution.
traditional — paper, lab report, handout, poster, powerpoint presentation
emerging — video, vlog, graphic, immersive (using Unreal Engine™, Matterport, 360º video, Second Life™ or other platform)
Step 8. Here’s What.
Share your findings.
traditional — submit to teacher, present to class, make friends/family read
emerging — post online (with parent permission and knowing that what’s online is on forever), ask to share on library website as research exemplar (see prior parenthetical), enter in contest connected with research, ask expert in field to evaluate
The above information literacy model (ILM) seeks to add a media literacy component which requires in teachers and students a minimal knowledge, at least, of multi-modal analysis. TESOIL, therefore, pulls from Marshall McLuhan’s seminal work on the medium as the message (1964). It also pulls from ILM work from Kuhlthau (2018), Loertscher (2005), and the Big6 (website).
Standard 3.3 Technology-Enabled Learning. Candidates use digital tools, resources, and emerging technologies to design and adapt learning experiences. Candidates engage all learners in finding, evaluating, creating, and communicating data and information in a digital environment. Candidates articulate, communicate, model, and teach digital citizenship.
In order to bring digital tools to the library learning space, they must first be considered for their efficacy in the task. Therefore, I submit my evaluation of five online programs as one way in which I demonstrate my ability to successfully meet this standard. The evaluation can be found here.
Another way in which I meet this standard is in my introductory lesson with classes coming into the ELC to use the zSpace space. After a brief tour of the ELC, students are asked to choose a computer space (and to choose carefully) so that they are aware of how the technology operates (with holographic images), how it might impact them (headaches and/or eye strain), and what its programs hope to achieve (higher engagement with and deeper learning of the subject). However, what is most emphasized is that the technology is only a tool and that they must determine if the tool is augmenting or deterring their learning. Their thoughts can be seen in the following slides from my zCon presentation: Eldorado’s zSpace Space.
Standard 4: Organization and Access
Candidates in school librarian preparation programs model, facilitate, and advocate for equitable access to and the ethical use of resources in a variety of formats. Candidates demonstrate their ability to develop, curate, organize, and manage a collection of resources to assert their commitment to the diverse needs and interests of the global society. Candidates make effective use of data and other forms of evidence to evaluate and inform decisions about library policies, resources, and services. ALA Librarian Preparation Standards 4.
Standard 4.1. Access. Candidates serve as agents of change by creating an inclusive learning environment that ensures ethical, equitable access to and use of physical, digital, and virtual resources in support of the needs of its learning community. Candidates design, develop, and implement evidence-based strategic solutions for addressing physical, social, virtual, economic, geographic, and intellectual barriers to equitable access to resources and services.
Evidence that I have understood and am implementing and upholding this standard will be evident in the redesign of our library facility. As noted in Photos 1-3, we are currently in the middle of reimagining the facility, beginning by reimagining the space; this reimagining includes moving and weeding 29,000 volumes and their affiliated bookcases.
Ultimately, the space will house learning corrals made from bookshelves, 4 bookshelves wide by 6 deep to meet ADA specifications. I’ll also experiment with the aesthetics of moving shelve heights with the intent of creating easy access for wheelchair patrons while simultaneously creating a visually interesting environment. Plans for the space furnishing are in development with the aide of Machabee Designs and, while currently limiting those furnishing options to school specific material, will be opened to a plethora of possibilities when I meet with the company’s district representative Tuesday. Until a CAD rendering is available, however, the generic specifications I’ve created for my LIS 6400 class can be found here as evidence of my preliminary interpretation of Standard 4.1, Access.
Standard 4.2 Information Resources. Candidates use evaluation criteria and selection tools to develop, curate, organize, and manage a collection designed to meet the diverse curricular and personal needs of the learning community. Candidates evaluate and select information resources in a variety of formats.
Evidence for this completion of this standard is still in progress as I am in the middle of polling faculty and students about the resources and interests they would like to have available for use in and out of the library. The policy that I am currently using is standard for the district I am in and has yet to be reviewed by our library committee because we do not have a library committee this year — we will for 2023-2024.
In addition to the in-progress collection policy, there are two bits of evidence to offer for my understanding of this standard: a library hosted a Henderson Police Department discussion for our Crime & Justice class and a zSpace presentation for our faculty. The first was inspired by a brief exchange with two students when I first arrived on site in November 2022; the second at the request of our autoshop teacher. Both events were a success. The first added real world experience to the students’ book learning as 8 female police officers of varied backgrounds, positions, and experiences shared their stories and answered questions from the students; the second demonstrated a technological learning tool that could increase student engagement and hopefully learning across multiple disciplines. Additionally, both events illustrated to faculty, students, and administration potential learning uses of the space and my commitment as their librarian to serve their needs.
In addition to Photo 4, the in-progress collection policy can be found here as another artifact of my understanding of standard 4.2.
Standard 4.3 Evidence-Based Decision Making. Candidates make effective use of data and information to assess how practice and policy impact groups and individuals in their diverse learning communities.
Photo 1 by a. gardner 2023 | Eldorado High School Library learning corral in progress.
Photo 2 by a. gardner 2023 | Eldorado High School Library “technology center.”
Photo 3 by a. gardner 2023 | Eldorado High School Library in media res.
Photo 4. Librarian and Henderson Police Department Outreach Officers.
Photo 1 | Honor Chemistry students in an impromptu reading of The Cat in the Hat during a soft lockdown. This is the first use of the ELC in true library fashion as they were there for an introduction to the zSpace computers which will be integral to their science education in the fall.
Photo 2| Lilia Todd. In media res of rolling ultra white on the walls of ELC Gallery 1, also known as our entryway. Photo by a. gardner.
Video 1 | Advertisement for the E.L.C. faculty preview on 8/9 | © agardner 2024
Standard 5: Leadership, Advocacy, and Professional Responsibility
Candidates in school librarian preparation programs are actively engaged in leadership, collaboration, advocacy, and professional networking. Candidates participate in and lead ongoing professional learning. Candidates advocate for effective school libraries to benefit all learners. Candidates conduct themselves according to the ethical principles of the library and information profession.
Standard 5.1 Professional Learning. Candidates engage in ongoing professional learning. Candidates deliver professional development designed to meet the diverse needs of all members of the learning community.
At present, ongoing professional learning is exhibited most readily via my library information science courses at SUU. Outside of graduate school, I will attend the Emily Dickinson International Society Conference in Amherst, MA at the end of July which will allow me to deepen my connection to the special collections librarians at Amherst College as a secondary librarian instead of a donor or Dickinson scholar. I’ve also continued being mentored beyond the school’s requirements by my librarian friends Dr. Andrea Trudeau, Professor Carol Kelly, mentor-mentee relationships rooted in friendships founded over mutual interests long ago. My graduate school scholarship, my personal interests, and my friendships all help me to meet the first part of this standard. Additionally, and more importantly, the experiences I gain from these activities are ones I bring into my professional persona and share when appropriate with students and faculty, modeling for students how learning is not constrained to the walls of a classroom. In future, if I remain as a librarian, I will consider joining associations such as those I have reviewed here.
The second part of this standard, “delivering professional development designed to meet the diverse needs of all members of the learning community” has already begun to be fulfilled as I transition from project manager for the ELC to the ELC librarian. As project manager, I asked the faculty at large, those who opted to take a chance on the new librarian, how they have used the library in the past and how they would want to use it in the future. One response was a place for zSpace lessons to occur. Because of their request, the ELC houses a 40 seat zSpace space and I have begun creating professional development for faculty on how to use the immersive computers. The first lesson of this project is the flipped lesson, What is zSpace. Though this learning is focused toward faculty, the computers themselves are for student learning and engagement and assist in the learning .
Standard 5.2 Leadership and Collaboration. Candidates lead and collaborate with members of the learning community to effectively design and implement solutions that positively impact learner growth and strengthen the role of the school library.
The ELC is a physical representation of a curricular and pedagogical collaboration between librarian and the learning community. The space has morphed from the storage facility it was when I arrived (housing over 24,000 volumes, 160 chairs, various sectional seatings, and one black widow spider) to the more modern, multi-fuctional use facility that will reopen in the fall. The design is a combination of what administration and faculty and students told me they wanted — a multi-use space (admin), group work capacity (faculty), and more true crime options (students). While true crime options within the collection are not facility per se, the plan does give students different seating options for the reading of them.
There is a zSpace space sectioned off from the collection area by high-backed benches. This, too, is a collaborative effort between faculty and librarian and administration and IT. Though one faculty instigated the procurement of the zSpace computers, eight others joined the crusade and we have 40 for the entire faculty to use with their students. As with any roll-out, our collaboration has started on a small scale - nine faculty members, mostly science, learning the computers on their own and then bringing select classes in so students and teachers alike can see how the teaching might go come fall. This fall my colleague, artist and art teacher Lilia Todd (see Photo 1 at left), will add art to the courses using the zSpace space and bring her AP students in to create art in 3D. Additionally, Ms. Wafer, a special education math teacher will bring her students for geometry and I will host a monthly zSpace Crew Collaboration Coffee where those forging the pedagogy can learn from one another.
In addition to the ELC hosting the zSpace space, it will also host a speaker’s series for interested students regardless their gpa. The only requirement for attendance is a desire to learn, approval to miss class from the appropriate faculty, and a promise to abide by the library rules. In 2022-2023, the library hosted Community in Schools (CIS) Christmas party, their awards ceremony, and a panel presentation by the Henderson Police Department for our Crime and Justice classes; in 2023-2024 the ELC hosted the CIS Christmas party, their awards ceremony, and the first annual spring Eldorado Art Show. In 2024-2025 the ELC will add a December art show, a Community Stars speakers series (that will include the Henderson Police Chief, newly elected Judge Wolfson, a Cirque d’Soliel acrobat, and a YoNutz franchise owner to start), and a mock crime scene for the Crime and Justice students to solve staged in collaboration with the Henderson Police Department.
Standard 5.3 Advocacy. Candidates advocate for all learners, resources, services, policies, procedures, and school libraries through networking and collaborating with the larger education and library community.
The creation of the ELC has been an advocacy undertaking. Each purchase, each design, each book culled or collected, each space planned with the one goal of creating for the larger Eldorado community a place for teachers to teach, students to learn, and people to be. While the space itself might be altered, the procedures have still to be set in place and tried and refined. However, to do this, people must come to the space. This is where my practicum time ties most directly to the standards. Ms. Alberti recommended Canva for faculty outreach and her examples epitomized her. My media of choice is iMovie and so, incorporating Alberti’s mantra of don’t waste their time, but interest them in, I created Video 1 (to the left) in order to bring faculty into the space for an informal introduction and to suss out how I might help them in the 2024-2025 school year. This video exemplifies the advocacy standard by directly targeting the learning audience to come into the space. Getting faculty to the ELC and to interact with it librarian, me, is the foundational step to increasing my collaboration abilities.
One larger collaborative effort will be with a submission to present at LibLearnX with my zSpace Crew. If we are accepted, the validation they will earn in the space outside of our campus will, hopefully, help them continue their collaborative and cross-curricular practices after I have left. This preparation for the future of the space independent of the librarian might also be viewed as an advocacy of sorts - an advocacy that teaches ownership of the library facility to others from a librarian’s perspective so that the efforts, pedagogical and curricular and behavioral, are maintained by the larger school community, thus ensuring its survival beyond one librarian.
Standard 5.4 Ethical Practice. Candidates model and promote the ethical practices of librarianship, as expressed in the foundational documents of the library profession including the American Library Association Code of Ethics and the Library Bill of Rights.
I must admit that this has been the most difficult standard for me. Partly because I have had little time to focus on the issue of librarian ethics due to familial issues and extra library time that demanded attention before the power went out in the main building (which houses the ELC) for all of July. My initial thoughts on librarian ethics (found in this video) still hold true; however, before the start of school, I will revisit the subject and codify my curating practices, both collecting and culling, so as to reinforce ethical librarian behaviors. An example of this is the codification of use via an ELC Interest form that patrons must fill out in order to reserve space in the ELC. The form eliminates favoritism, intentional or not, from the reservation process by collecting the time of submission which, barring non-academic use requests, will be fulfilled on a first-come-first-served basis.
Still to be created are forms for student book requests, requirements for extracurricular use, and post-mortem procedures with those who use the space so that improvements can be made. Each of these items will provide guidelines that, if created in accordance with the ethical practices promoted in our profession, and they will be, should help me maintain and uphold those ethics.
Requirement Area #6 Competencies: Technology.
Technology-Enabled Learning. Candidates use digital tools, resources, and emerging technologies to design and adapt learning experiences. Candidates engage all learners in finding, evaluating, creating, and communicating data and information in a digital environment. Candidates articulate, communicate, model, and teach digital citizenship. Southern Utah University K-12 Library Media Endorsement Competencies.
This competency is evident in the technology that has been brought in to the ELC for faculty and student use. Evidence for this can be seen in my purposeful inclusion of technology into Eldorado High School’s library (now the ELC), the job for which I was hired in November 2022 and which will fully reopen in August of 2024.
Candidates use digital tools, resources, and emerging technologies to design and adapt learning experiences.
One aspect of this competency can be seen in the aesthetic design for the ELC. Specifically, with the acceptance and hanging of the print The Mathematician 2.0 by Artnwordz.
The work, The Mathematician 2.0, incorporates AR via a QR code to use emerging technologies for educational experiences. By highlighting Albert Einstein, one of the 20th century’s preeminent physicists, by incorporating physics to make a statement about love, and, further, by doing so via art, another subject with which students should be aware, it provides a plethora of learning possibilities for myriad subjects. Because it is art, this media encourages students to respond to it on a personal level before doing so scientifically or analytically, and because this print incorporates AR and students are allowed to use their phones (if they ask first), it encourages them to engage with an adaptive technology to ultimately learn something. Additionally, the print presents possibilities to those students interested in 3D media, in creativity, in art, in connecting the technological possibilities beyond the current ways technology is being used.
The few students who have engaged with Einstein have been mostly impressed and curious; the faculty who have experienced it have been shocked and awed, mesmerized and overjoyed, encouraged and recharged — their teacher brains began turning and the seeds for new lessons with students in the library in the new year have been planted.
To experience meet Einstein and learn about his equation, please scan the QR code in Image 1 and, while the experience is loading on your phone, focus your camera on the fully framed print in Image 2.
Candidates engage all learners in finding, evaluating, creating, and communicating data and information in a digital environment.
The use of the Goosechase platform as an introduction to students this session and faculty and students in the new school year shows my ability to meet these requirements. While the experience is no longer available for play, the beta testing of it with three students provided enough encouragement for me to pursue discussing possible purchase with my administration for the ELC and faculty.
Another example of assisting learners, both faculty and students, in finding, evaluating, creating, and communicating data and information in a digital environment, was with their introduction to their zSpace space. All teachers interested in the technology are required to take it home to use it in order to determine if it is necessary for their content. They will also be required to complete a Canvas course designed to encourage them to play with the programming as a learner and think about how to apply it as a teacher (this course is also necessary if they are to be paid for their time).
Candidates articulate, communicate, model, and teach digital citizenship.
One principal of digital citizenship is media literacy; a part of media literacy is “using screens mindfully” (Media Literacy Now). While Eldorado High School is a one-to-one school with rampant screen use via mobiles and laptops, the ELC counters this with its phone policy, a move that also serves to model and have students practice this aspect of digital citizenship. To whit: never have a phone out when in a class, never when on your own in the ELC except when you’re viewing the Einstein, and only one earbud, pre-set to music so the phone is never out and the librarian never hears (this is also a safety issue).
While there is a zSpace computer lab with 40 units, they are in a separate section and only used when in a class setting and for purposes the teacher deems it necessary to use its 3D/360 capabilities. This models purposeful use of technology. Moreover, when students use the technology, they will be asked to reflect on the technology as a tool (see student aggregate responses in Slideshow 1 to the right). Moreover, while six computers connected to a printer will be available for student individual use, they take up a minority of space and are the least attractive of the seating areas. The ELC’s interior is designed to encourage study habits, prompt quiet group discussions, and enable individual reflection - actions that will mostly pull students from their screens into their world.
To encourage students to be aware of digital citizenship broadly, the articulate 360 interactive presentation Digital Citizenship @ the ELC will be used. It also supports my proficiency in the technology competency for candidacy. To encourage teachers to be aware of digital citizenship, those using zSpace will be required to watch John Green’s Navigating Digital Information Crash Course #10 . However, in order to reach a larger audience, I’m going to propose to my principal that we craft a school-wide media literacy awareness campaign introduced with Dino Ambrosi’s Tedx Talk The Battle for Your Time during a 3rd period for every class the second week of school (which will tie in with the district’s new no phones during school policy); I’m going to suggest we build on that during Media Literacy Week beginning 24 October 2024 by having a 2-day school wide almost synchronous showing of each of Green’s courses in his Navigating Digital Information Crash Course.
Technology-enabled learning may be the most important literacy digital natives will master and, therefore, one of the most important skills for librarians to learn. Underpinning the entire idea of learning and technology is the pedagogical skill of media literacy which many teachers have not been taught and, therefore, are ill-equipped to teach (U.S. Media Literacy Report 2023). Integrating media literacy practices into the ELC is one way this librarian is subtly (and sometimes not so subtly) modeling and teaching the digital literacies of this requirement. More, while technology is inevitable in modernity and, therefore a subject students must learn in their education, I believe it must be integrated in such a way that technology remains a tool for teachers to use instead of teachers becoming the tools technology uses.
“Media literacy is the ability to: decode media messages, including the systems in which they exist; assess the influence of those messages on our thoughts, feelings, behaviors, perceptions, beliefs, health, and on our society; and use and create media to provide information, send a message, or tell one’s own story in a way that is thoughtful, conscientious, safe, and responsible.
”
Image 1. Scan the QR code. While it’s loading, focus on the complete framed image of Artnwordz’ work below. The print was given to the ELC as a gift from the artists because he figured the students may like it. I figure he’s right.
Image 2 by a. gardner. Print of “the mathematician 2.0” by Artnwordz